Archive for the ‘Policing’ Category

Devolution of justice: part 2010

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Keeping with the theme of the Devolution of Justice, it’s appropiate at this stage to highlight the internal scrambling of SF on the issue. Where to start……

In the Assembly, SF is content to attack the SDLP to attempt to cover their many contradictions and weaknesses; claiming that we are attempting to serve our own interests in the issue of the allocation of the ministry.

You couldn’t make it up. SF; the party responsible for effectively collapsing the government for five months because they didn’t get their own way accuse the SDLP of being self serving!

We have made our position very clear. The method that the DUP conned SF into adopting for the allocation of the post is a major digression from the Good Friday Agreement. An agreement supported by the majority of the Irish people in a referendum. The SDLP is right and proper to oppose that method. Power Sharing and proportionality are fundamental pillars of the GFA and SF is blindly assisting the DUP in picking apart the agreement.

Alban Maginness said it well when he said ‘If we depart from d’Hondt, we effectively undermine and weaken partnership in this institution…It is also the fairest way to bring about proper representation and a level of input from every significant political opinion. If we abandon that, we abandon fairness…The SDLP is committed to d’Hondt and would like, in the first instance, d’Hondt to be completely rerun. If that is required, let us do that. If that cannot be achieved, let us top up d’Hondt ‘

It couldn’t be made any clearer that it’s not about the SDLP, but about the hard fought protections under the GFA that SF are giving away.

So John O’Dowd then outlined that SF are not selling out power sharing and that an SDLP member could apply for the post. But they needed a CV. And they needed to take that CV to Peter Robinson.

Wait. What? What did John O’Dowd say? Did he just say that in order for a nationalist to become Justice Minister; they have to prepare a CV, take their CV to Peter Robinson, a Unionist, and await an answer?

That’s outlined in the GFA where exactly?  What do you think his answer would be? 

SF are in a spin (pun) over this. They held their special Ard Fheis in 2007 and passed a motion to sign up to policing with the provision that Justice would be devolved by May 2008. It’s now the end of 2009. We’ll soon be in 2010.

It seems their “chief negotiator” is doing well then (on this, and everything/anything else).

Eye on the Hill – Devolution of Justice

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Gregory Campbell has said that it will be a number of years yet before we successfully devolve justice powers to Northern Ireland.

Martin McGuinness has said that there will be severe political consequences if there isn’t a date for devolution before Christmas (which is funny, considering earlier this month they voted down an SDLP motion calling for just that – but we’ll park that).

I suppose this is the definition of a stalemate really. Just like everything else in the DUP/SF dominated Executive at the minute.

It’s quite obvious that Peter Robinson is having internal difficulties with his own party, the Dodds and Campbells and the like. While he needed, and was quite content I should add, to use them to get what he wanted (the top job), he is now faced with an internal power struggle against those very people he needed to oust Paisley. Hence Campbell putting down a maker.

Add that to the fact that Robinson knows that the best method of challenging the TUV is to go to the electorate with a record of delivery, delivery that is noticeable and that makes a difference to the general public. Something he is failing to do.

So he has turned to blaming the institutions for those failures. He claims that they are not designed to deliver fast or work properly. What he fails to mention though is that the ‘mutual veto’ (the mechanism holding everything up) is the mechanism that he negotiated at St. Andrew’s and that his party and Sinn Fein were happy with. Attacking the institutions is so transparent and pretty weak from the leader of the largest party.

On the one hand, the TUV are breathing down his neck and on the other SF are holding up progress (equal to the DUP, on different issues). To blame the system and not address the issues in his own party he will soon find to be a flawed strategy.

People are beyond the point of accepting the argument that “it’s the system, not us” and just want value for money and delivery from their government. The fact is, this is the system these parties wanted and they are both culpable for the failure to deliver. The institutions work, it’s the dominant parties running them that don’t.

We all know that. Change of tactic for Mr Robinson I would presume.

Miscarrages of Justice – SDLP Newry Event

Monday, April 20th, 2009

As regular readers of no gloss just matt will be aware, SDLP in West Belfast held a Miscarriages of Justice event at the SDLP Annual Conference. The event was very successful and very well attended.

The atmosphere of the event, due to the speakers very moving contributions, was poignant, and the SDLP agreed to follow this up with another similar event for those who where not able to attend the one in Armagh.

SDLP Newry have now arranged an event to be held this Wednesday in the Canal Court Hotel in Newry at 7.30pm. Everyone is invited.

 

Speakers include, no gloss just matt contributor Gerry Conlon of the Gilford Four, Breege Quinn, who’s son Paul Quinn was murdered with no one brought to justice, Raymond McCord, who’s son Raymond McCord Jnr was murdered and Anne Morgan, who’s brother, Seamus Ruddy is one of the disappeared.

The event will be chaired by the SDLP’s Alban Maguinness MLA, the party’s European Candidate and Justice Spokesperson.

If you couldn’t get to the event in Armagh in January, or if you are interested in the (lack of) Justice processes in NI relating the troubles/paramilitaries, or if you want to hear moving personal testimonies from tireless campaigners for justice, I would highly recommend that you try and attend.

Photos of SDLP Seminar

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009
SDLP European Candidate Alban Maguinness MLA with John Ware and michael Gallagher

SDLP European Candidate Alban Maguinness MLA with John Ware and Michael Gallagher

Margaret ritchie MLA, Minister for Social Development

Margaret Ritchie MLA, Minister for Social Development

Dolores Kelly MLA with John ware and Barney Rowan

Dolores Kelly MLA with John Ware and Barney Rowan

Alex Attwood MLA with Dame Nuala O'Loan in the audience

Alex Attwood MLA with Dame Nuala O'Loan

MArk Durkan MP MLA closing the Seminar

MArk Durkan MP MLA closing the Seminar

Policing and it’s oversight at times of threat – Seminar overview!

Monday, March 30th, 2009

The audiance was healthy in number and dynamic in composition – that’s those who where present for an SDLP Seminar in St. Mary’s College on the Falls Road focusing on Policing and it’s oversight at times of threat.

The Seminar boasted some very high profile and informed panellists such as John Ware, Barney Rowan and Dame Nuala O’Loan. There were fascinating accounts of real life tragedies and struggles from contributors such as Michael Gallagher and Brendan Duddy.  

A very adept account of particular aspects of the event has already been written, click here and here to view.

For the second time this year (and probably ever) I was reading an opinion piece by Newton Emerson in the Irish News and said, ‘he’s got a point here.’  (Below)

accountability-only-way-to-draw-out-toxic-intelligence

There was an overwhelming consensus in the room, coming from the speakers and the mood of those present that robust oversight is needed to monitor the intelligence services – right now virtually none exists. As Professior Colin Harvey of QUB said at the Seminar, ‘is it right that a police officer is subject to far reaching accountability measures and the intelligence officer they happen to be working with is subject to virtually none? Of course not!’ 

That was very much the consensus. But there was also a feeling in the room – that for whatever reason the intelligence services have continually escaped proper scrutiny, that that will always remain the case. There are too many vested interests, particularly in Northern Ireland, for doors to be opened or lights shone in dark corners. As Barney Rowan said, the governments have an interest in keeping the light off, as do Loyalist and Republican paramilitaries.

As Newton Emerson said in his article ‘  Currently, the peace process approach to intelligence is to build a wall between it and policing so that policing can be made accountable without compromising intelligence. This is why surveillance of dissidents now falls to MI5. Sinn Fein fully endorses this policy, to the point of making a bogus distinction between intelligence and “civic policing”.

Not only does Sinn Fein endorse this separation of accountability, effectively meaning robust oversight of policing and none of the spooks - but they negotiated it! It makes one wonder about those vested interests. And with the presence of Alex Maskey and Bobby Storey at the Seminar on Saturday, one wonders a little more?!

It truely was a dirty war, but people such as the families of those murdered in the Omagh bomb should not have to pay the price of no scrutiny, while undoubtedly others reap the rewards.

POLICING AND IT’S OVERSIGHT AT TIMES OF THREAT

Friday, March 27th, 2009

I want to draw people’s attention, (albeit at this late stage) to the SDLP seminar on ‘Policing and it’s Oversight at times of threat.

The details are here.

The calibre of the speakers and the theme of the event speaks for itself. It will prove to be a very informative and worthwhile event.

For those that can’t make it but want to, I will be providing an overview of the content of each of the speakers speeches, and of the seminar in general after the event.

Throughout the event I will also be ‘twittering’.